Similarities Between Winston Churchill And Queen...

Queen Elizabeth and Winston Churchill are both famously known in history but also for their speeches given. Queen Elizabeth was taxed with the task of rallying British commoners, many of them untrained farmers, to battle the Spanish Armada as they closed in on the coast of England in 1588. In 1940, three days into his new appointment as Prime Minister, Winston Churchill faced the daunting task of unifying the country during Britain’s involvement in World War II. Both figures had different audiences during their respective speeches. Winston Churchill uses repetition in his speech while Queen Elizabeth uses imagery in her speech to show their position on war; however, Queen Elizabeth’s speech is more effective. In both speeches given by†¦show more content†¦As he stated, â€Å"We shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills. We shall never surrender.† Another rhetorical device used in his speech was alliteration. He used repeating letters and sounds in these phrases â€Å"I see also the dull, drilled, docile, brutish masses of the Hun soldiery plodding on like a swarm of crawling locusts.†, and â€Å"We want no parlay with you and your grisly gang who work your wicked will.† Both Queen Elizabeth and Winston Churchill’s speeches also have many differences. Winston Churchill writes his speeches in an inevitable rhythm , which united the use of repetition. His speeches attain a type of imperial power reminiscent of Shakespeare. Everyone who heard these speeches was filled with faith and conviction, and it allowed our island to survive pure evil. Queen Elizabeth’s speech did not use poetry; her speech just gave a normal speech. Another difference in the speeches would be the time periods that the two speeches were